Back to Evolution Main Index

On absolutely no evidence, and, indeed -evidence to the contrary, Darwinian evolution is still proclaimed by many to be quite true. The natural laws of thermodynamics have been violated; the billions and billions of 'missing links' of plants and animals don't exist; gigantic mountains turn upside down and move hundreds of miles without breaking or crumbling, to accommodate the discrepancies in the geological column; millions and millions of positive, beneficial, directionless, random mutations, apparently move life up the ladder of complexity, despite the fact that no beneficial mutations have ever been scientifically observed. Assumptions become the rule - assumptions bordering on fantasy.

Darwinism was a dream and now the dream has ended. Darwinian evolution was unique beyond comprehension. Widely propagated and promoted effectively, it became the only theory in history to be accepted on scientific grounds, despite the fact that it had absolutely no authentic scientific evidence to support its claims. How was this possible? What forces were behind such an enormous campaign of falsity?

To a certain degree, the Darwinist position was dependent upon our own ignorance; that is, our ignorance towards the true nature and content of scientific, geological and historical evidence conflicting with evolution.

There can be no doubt as to the fact that the media and communication world in general, have been able to effectively mask sensible contrary evidence conflicting with evolution. Darwinian evolution is still taught in many schools - that is, taught with bias towards evolution, without any reference to arguments contrary, some of which we have discussed.

Why are we happy to continue along a road paved with fallacies, discrepancies, and outlandish assumptions, to support the belief in a theory with absolutely no real or physical truth? How can the rational mind believe in a theory which violates natural scientific laws and offers no tangible evidence in its support? Despite this, different theories are churned out in abundance. From the beginnings of this essay to its completion, I have noted several new theories in both the Scientific Journal and National Geographic magazines.

Yes - Darwinian evolution is gone and evolution by infinitesimal steps over immense time spans has been relinquished.

It follows therefore, that if you still want to believe in evolution, you have no other option than to pursue the theory currently on offer - 'Punctuated Equilibrium'.

Firstly, we must recognize the theory of the 'Big Bang' or similar i.e. that the entire matter of our universe had eternally existed in an infinitely small volume. Following a completely unprovoked explosion, this awesome amount of matter burst forth, organizing in its chaotic path the great elements from which our planets and universe were born. Incidentally - during this explosion, the inclines, trajectories, constituents and motions of the planets would be established; the earth with a relative star and unique ability to support organic life, and so on... The great seas would also have been established at this point. The probability of such an event happening in the correct sequence, to produce the observed outcome - is more than 10 to the power of 200 - which is effectively no chance!

Finally, if these countless improbabilities were overcome and life had begun its evolutionary journey, defying every known scientific laws in the process; much would still have to be achieved.

Thence we have the theory of one species spontaneously giving birth to a different species....

Punctuated-Equilibrium

For one species to give birth to another species with a marked difference, the genetic material would have to undergo radical re-configuration in a collective, systematic and constructive way. The improbability of this happening on a frequent basis is exceedingly greater than the improbabilities of the formation of simple organic molecules discussed earlier; it is effectively zero!

However, human arrogance and intellectual blindness that challenges these mind-boggling improbabilities then has to reconcile the final irrefutable time-bomb to this particular theory:

The birth of this new species would be accompanied by the random birth of an identical species of opposite sex; with fully functional reproductive organs and complementary sex cells - in order that the species propagate a male and a female of the species.

After all - the new species would be unable to breed with its parent stock - if it is indeed a new species. What is the probability of this happening?

Furthermore, the awesome scale and quantity of species of plant and animal testify to a peculiar event which must surely happen on a frequent basis.

It would be ridiculous if it were not laughable, to suggest that homosapiens will one day give rise to a completely different species. It was once taught that the 48 chromosomes of the ape and the 46 chromosomes of humans, demonstrated the clear spontaneous transition by punctuated equilibrium, through a simple shifting and rearrangement of genetic information. However, advances in genetic study have shown us that the interdependent genes pertaining to certain functions in apes; for example - the formation of eyes, ears, bones etc., are totally different from those in humans. The replication of genes and extraction of relevant information is conducted by unique 'punctuation marks' on the chromosomes. The ability for the RNA replicator to copy the information exactly is made possible by scanning the genetic information in a certain direction, thus enabling the replication of genetic information to be consistent. However, the ape to man transition has been renounced because it is now known that the replication of genetic information for man and ape is scanned from opposite directions. The entire genetic constituents of each species are therefore deemed to be completely different.

The theories continue to pour out in abundance, none of them ever seeming to stand the test of time. Every day another scientist proposes the way in which 'it happened' - hard facts once again unavailable!

You know, and I know, that evolution did not happen.

The 20th Century is the unfortunate century that has abandoned supernaturalism and replaced it with humanistic naturalism. The great appetite of secular man has been satisfied by an alternative doctrine to the doctrine of God; the consequences of which we are now beginning to reap......

Five proofs for the existence of God

The first and more manifest way is the argument from motion. It is certain, and evident to our senses, that in the world some things are in motion. Now whatever is moved is moved by another, for nothing can be moved except it is in potentiality to that towards which it is moved; whereas a thing moves in as much as it is in act. For motion is nothing else than the reduction of something from potentiality to actuality. But nothing can be reduced from potentiality to actuality, except by something in a state of actuality.

The second way is from the nature of efficient cause. In the world of sensible things we find there is an order efficient causes. There is no case known (neither is it, indeed, possible) in which a thing is found to be the efficient cause of itself; for so it would be prior to itself, which is impossible. Now in efficient causes it is not possible to go on to infinity, because in all efficient causes following in order, the first is the cause of the intermediate cause, and the intermediate is the cause of the ultimate cause, whether the intermediate cause be several, or one only. Now to take away the cause is to take away the effect. Therefore, if there be no first cause among efficient causes, there will be no ultimate, nor any intermediate, cause. But if in efficient causes it is possible to go on to infinity, there will be no first efficient cause, neither will there be in ultimate effect, nor any intermediate efficient causes; all of which is plainly false. Therefore it is necessary to admit a first efficient cause, to which everyone gives the name of God.

The third way is taken from possibility and necessity, and runs thus. We find in nature things that are possible to be and not to be, since they are found to be generated and to be corrupted, and consequently, it is impossible for them to be and not to be. But it is impossible for these always to exist, for that which can not-be at some time is not. Therefore if anything can not-be, then at one time there was nothing in existence. Now if this were true, even now there would be nothing in existence, because that which does not exist begins to exist only through something already existing. Therefore, if at one time nothing were in existence, it would have been impossible for anything to begin to exist; and thus even now nothing would be in existence - which is absurd. Therefore, not all beings are merely possible, but there must exist something the existence of which is necessary. But every necessary thing either has its necessity caused by another, or not. Now it is impossible to go on to infinity in necessary things which have their necessity caused by another, as has been already proved in regard to efficient causes. Therefore we cannot but admit the existence of some being having of its own necessity, and not receiving it from another, but rather causing in others their necessity. This all men speak of as God.

The fourth way is taken from the gradation to he found in things. Among beings there are some more and some less good, true, noble, and the like. But more and less are predicated of different things according as they resemble in their different ways something which is the maximum, as a thing is said to be hotter according as it more nearly resembles that which is hottest; so that there is something which is truest, something best, something noblest, and, consequently, something which is most being, for those things that are greatest in truth are greatest in being, as it is written in Metaph, ii. Now the maximum in any genus is the cause of all in that genus, as fire, which is the maximum of heat, is the cause of all hot things as is said in the same book. Therefore there must be something which is to all beings the cause of their being, goodness, and every other perfection; and this we call God.

The fifth way is taken from the governance of the world. We see that things which lack knowledge, such as natural bodies, act for an end, and this is evident from their acting always, or nearly always, in the same way, so as to obtain the best result. Hence it is plain that they achieve their end, not fortuitously, but designedly. Now whatever lacks knowledge cannot move towards an end, unless it is directed by some being endowed with knowledge and intelligence as the arrow is directed by the archer. Therefore some intelligent being exists by whom all natural things are directed to their end; and this being we call God.

1. "The Origin And Early History Of Man" - Lumen Christi Press, Houston, Texas.

2. Human Culture: "Doorway Papers" (No.32) Primitive Cultures, Their Historical Origins" Part I and Part 2, by Dr.

Arthur C. Custance.

3. "The Origin Of Life: A Critique" - Dr. Duane T. Gish.

4. "Critique Of Radiometric Dating" - Harold S. Slusher, M.S.

5. "Origin And Destiny Of Earth's Magnetic Field" - Thomas C. Barnes, Professor of Physics at University of Texas, El Paso.

6. "The Genesis Flood" 1961; 15th printing 1972, - Henry M. Morris, Ph.D. and John C. Whitcomb, Jr., Ph.D.

7. "The Twilight Of Evolution" 1963 - Dr. H.M. Morris.

8. "The Origin Of The Solar System" 1964 - John C. Whitcomb, Jr., Ph.D.

9. "Darwin: Before And After" 1967 - Robert E.D. Clark, Ph.D.

10. "Prehistory and Earth Models" 1966 - Melvin A. Cook, Ph.D.

11. "Evolution: The Fossils Say No!" 1973 - Duane T. Gish, Ph.D.

12. "Evolution And Christian Faith" 1969 - Bolton Davidheiser, Ph.D.

13. "A Young World After All" - 1986 Paul D. Ackerman, Ph.D.

14. "The Challenge of the Fossil Record" 1985 - Duane T. Gish, Ph.D.

15. "Ape or Image" 1981 - Dr. John Rendle-Short.

16. "Bone of Contention" - Sylvia Baker, M.Sc.

17. "Ape-Men: Fact or Fallacy?" 1977 - Malcolm Bowden.

18. "A Challenging 'Introduction' To The Origin Of Species" (1956) Professor W.R. Thompson, ER.S.

19. "Lessons of Piltdown" (A Study In Scientific Enthusiasm at Piltdown, Java and Peking) (1959), - Francis Vere.

20. "The Genetic Revolution" - Dr Patrick Dixon.

21. "Heredity Development and Evolution" - Christine Birkett.

22. "Evolution - a modern synthesis" - W.H. Dowdeswell.

23. "The Making of Mankind" - Richard E. Leakey.

24. "Genetics and Adaptation" - E.B. Ford.

25. "Evolution" - Ruth Moote.