What do Year
9 students consider when they make choices?
The following was what my
students decided would be the steps that they would take when
making a moral decision.
The original "Stop Sign
Method" included the Bible, Church teaching, Jesus, Reason,
Natural Law, an Informed Conscience and so forth, as the steps
that a Christian would take in helping them make a correct moral
decision.
I asked each group to come up
with 5 steps that the group as a whole decided upon. It is
enlightening for students and teachers to discover 'how' students
make decisions and what they think about 'how' they make
decisions. Do these steps respect the right of ALL in our society
or only of some? See below for what the students themselves said.
Following are the steps the
different groups created. Do you notice any similarities?
- PEERS - WHAT WILL THEY THINK?
- YOURSELF - WHAT DO YOU THINK OF
IT?
- PARENTS - WHAT WILL BE THEIR
REACTION?
- WILL - DO YOU WANT TO DO IT?
- LAW - WHAT DOES THE LAW SAY
ABOUT IT?
|
- LAW - IS IT ILLEGAL? WILL I
BENEFIT FROM IT?
- PUNISHMENT - WILL I GET PUNISHED
IF I DO IT?
- PARENTS - WOULD MY PARENTS MIND
- PEERS - WHAT WILL MY FRIENDS THINK
ABOUT IT?
|
- HEALTH - WILL IT HARM MY BODY?
- RESPECT - DOES IT RESPECT
OTHERS?
- INSTINCT - WHAT DO I KNOW?
- COOL - IS IT COOL? WILL IT HELP
MY SOCIAL LIFE?
- REASONS - IS THERE A GOOD
REASON FOR DOING IT?
- FRIENDSHIP - WILL PEOPLE LIKE
ME?
- CONSCIENCE- WHAT DO I KNOW
ABOUT IT?
- CONSEQUENCES - WHAT WILL HAPPEN?
|
- PEERS - WHAT DO YOUR FRIENDS THINK?
- CONSEQUENCES - WHAT ARE THE LAWS
INVOLVED?
- VALUES - WHAT WILL YOU GET OUT OF
IT?
- REASONS - WHY DO YOU DO THIS?
|
- BENEFITS - HOW DOES THIS
BENEFIT ME?
- PEERS - WHAT DO MY FRIENDS SAY
ABOUT THIS?
- LAW - IS THIS LEGAL?
- INSTINCTS - WHAT IS YOUR GUT
FEELING?
- PUNISHMENT - WILL I GET
PUNISHED?
- PARENTS - WHAT WILL MY PARENTS
THINK?
- HEALTH - WILL IT AFFECT MY
HEALTH?
|
- PUNISHMENT - WHAT ARE THE
CONSEQUENCES?
- MONEY - DO WE HAVE ENOUGH?
- TRANSPORT - CAN WE GET THERE?
- FEELINGS - WHAT DO OUR GUTS TELL
US
|
- CONSCIENCE - DO I THINK IT IS
RIGHT?
- PUNISHMENT - WILL I GET INTO
TROUBLE?
- FAMILY - WILL IT AFFECT MY
FAMILY? HOW? OUR TRUST?
- MONEY/COST - DO I HAVE MONEY TO
SUPPORT IT?
- FRIENDS - WILL THEY STAY WITH
ME?
|
REASONS GIVEN IN RESPONSE TO
QUESTION:
Which of the methods respects the rights of ALL and
protects ALL in society?
" Mine is for teenagers and what the main part of
society and the law support. The other one is for the Church and
what old society wanted in olden times"
"
The one we received is more respective of everyone as it
is designed for everyone. The one we designed is designed
just for teenagers and what they would think of. Our stop
sign method does not respect the rights of the whole
community
If everyone followed the given stop
sign method it would protect everyone and their rights in
the community. I think everyone needs their own method,
but if not, overall, the religion based designed one is
more protective of the communities rights of everyone."
"The real stop sign method is more respectful of the
rights of all because it is more Christian than our one."
" I think the Stop sign
method most respects the rights of all and protects all
in the community. The method is more fair and the
questions make you think about your decision and what the
right and wrong decision is. In your own mind the
questions make you understand what you should do and why
you should do it. The Stop sign method does respect the
rights of all because it does what is right and it also
protects all in our community because of the same reason."
" Our stop sign method is based on a different age group
of people than the original Stop Sign method. So the original
Stop Sign Method probably respects the majority of people because
it is aimed at the whole community, not just at a certain age of
people"
" The Stop Sign Method and our
method have very different steps but I think overall our
own method respects the rights and protects all people in
our community." ( Law, Consequences, Peers,
Values, reason)
"Our stop sign method is based on teenagers and up. The
other Stop Sign Method is based on Religion and mainly what the
Church thinks and what your instinct feels about the issues. They're
both really based on decision making and you do what you feel
is the right thing to do. Our method is really teaching you how
to think or what's right and wrong and if you feel free within
yourself"
" I think our
stop sign method is better because it is not
stereotyped and it's more to what I myself think
about it. Also the other method is also very much based
on the Catholic Church and not everyone agrees with the
Church. One is more for teenagers who aren't necessarily
Christian and the other is more for older people who are
more likely to be Christian. The original one is
basically from someone else's point of view so it would
be much clearer and more understandable to have our own."
" I think the Stop Sign Method would be best for today's
society because of the consequences and all the stuff and non-harm
involved with the difference between our stop sign method and the
original one."
" I think
the method we made up was the best one because it came
from people our age that know what it is like to be a
teenager in the 90's. Our method seemed better
because it covered most of the issues that appear through
teenagers' lives. The other stop sign method was
effective too because it gave the questions to a wider
group of people. I mean it focused more on people ranging
from children to elderly people; that is something
everyone has to face."
" The original Stop Sign Method respects the rights of
ALL and protects ALL. My stop sign method worries more about my
self than others. The first steps of the original and mine are
respectively, " Does this action serve others? Is it loving?"
and " How does this benefit me?" As you can see, the
first asks how it helps others. This shows that you worry about
others as well as yourself. My method only worries about myself."
" I think our method
is better because the youth usually think about these things more
than Church and stuff like that. People these days think more
of acceptance rather than divine law. Most people would probably
not even know what that means. People also don't know what the
Church teaches. Considering whether something is respectful is
easier to understand than "Is the action human?"
"I think the original method respects the rights of
all. There are many models we may follow including Jesus
and The Holy Spirit."
" The original Stop Sign Method isn't as modern as the
new stop sign method. Not everyone is Catholic which makes it
a bit hard to use the original but everyone can use the new one.
Not everyone is in touch with their conscience. Conscience isn't
needed for the new one. A shorter method would be easier and less
time consuming. Many people have grown away from God and tend not
to think about him anymore. It depends on the person."
" My stop sign
method is the best because it is made by society not some
overpowering idiot. Society should make up the rules
because we have to abide by them and people don't like it
when they don't want to do it. Society should run the law
because we are the law. Even though the original stop
sign method is good, it is very hard to follow because;
not everyone is Catholic, not everyone knows the
Catechism off by heart or carries it around with them,
not everyone is in touch with their conscience, their
'guts' may tell them to propose the act, and the natural
law may say it is okay."
" I reckon mine is better because people don't usually
stop and think about Jesus and the Church. They usually just do
it.
People have run away from God because they think
they are free but get in trouble when they do something wrong
because we aren't really free."
I then posed the following questions to
my students!
- Which of the above don't actually answer the question but
demonstrate an emotional reaction to the question?
- Read the parts in italics. Is what is being said true?
- What are the rights that we all share as human beings?
- What should be the true role of society?